In my original essay, I weighed human security over the security of the state. I believed that it is important for the people to be secure in order for the state to be secure.
When examining security,
my belief is solidified in some of the things that we have learned this
semester in class. When learning about the Ebola outbreak, this proved to me
that security was individual and not state. Ebola crossed state boundaries,
largely because of the incompetence and inability of the government. The
governments in West Africa substantially contributed to the spread and outbreak
of Ebola, and did little to stop it in the early stages. This meant that it exploded
and spread almost internationally. Those who were at the largest risk were the
people. Ebola did not necessarily threaten the government, but rather those who
lived in poverty and densely populated areas.
Personal security
also deals out emancipation, because it makes all people equal and does not
discriminate. This can be seen in the case of human trafficking and sex
trafficking. Individuals, largely females, are kidnapped and forced into labor
against their will. They are taken from their homes and are shuffled around the
world into fields such as sex work, personal servants, and in factories to make
products. This is directly related to human security and emphasizes why it is
so important. If individuals cannot be protected from being kidnapped how can
they be protected at all? Without individuals and humans, there is no state and
government. If their government does not protect those inside of their state,
how can it be legitimate?
All of this also plays into Ontological
security. Ontological security deals with the mental stability of people based
on their surroundings. Without order, Ontological security is seriously
threatened. Human security plays into ontological security because human
security presents order. If people worry about being infected by Ebola or being
turned into a sex slave, they have no Ontological security. Ontological
security is important to the stability of a state, and if the people are not
secured there is no Ontological security which means that the state is in
danger. Therefore, human security leads to state security making it more
important in my belief
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.